FACT SHEET
The Value of Small Schools in Missouri
1) Student
achievement is higher in small schools
2) Student achievement is higher in small districts
3) Family income level is the single largest predictor of student achievement,
but smaller schools narrow the achievement gap between wealthier and poorer
students
4) There is no reliable relationship between school size and curriculum breadth and quality
5) Where available, the expanded curriculum in larger schools does
not always mean an expanded opportunity for student learning
6) Access to advanced courses and comprehensive curriculums can be
just as high in small schools
7) Small
schools do not necessarily cost more to operate
8) Administrator costs in small schools do not necessarily absorb a
larger portion of overall costs than in large schools
9) Small
schools contribute to greater involvement of students
10) Dropouts rates are lower and graduation
rates are higher in small schools
11) Students in small schools exhibit less
disruptive behavior
12) Greater parental involvement generally
exists in small schools
13) Small
schools are more likely to be safe, nurturing environments
14) Small rural districts and
large non-rural districts have the highest average tax levies in Missouri
15) There are serious inequities in the Missouri school foundation formula
16) The amount of local tax dollars spent on education in Missouri has
little relationship to district residents’ ability to pay
Economic Impact on the Community
17) Communities in which schools are located—especially small
communities—have a distinct economic advantage over communities in which no
school remains